Jane Ward
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Papers in
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 3
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 1
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 1
- Co-authors
- Gerry Armitage (2 shared papers)Rebecca Lawton (4 shared papers)Reema Sirriyeh (1 shared paper)Rosemary McEachan (3 shared papers)Karen L. Ayres (2 shared papers)Andrew Prestwich (2 shared papers)Mark Conner (2 shared papers)Ian Watt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Expectations (3 papers)BMC Geriatrics (2 papers)British Journal of Health Psychology (2 papers)BMC Primary Care (1 paper)British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jane Ward
14 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Applied Psychology 76
- Emergency Medical Services 66
- Pharmacy 43
- Family Practice 11
- Health Information Management 21
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Ward
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Ward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Ward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Ward more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Ward
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Ward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Ward. The network helps show where Jane Ward may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Ward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 11 | Relation to Selected Characteristics of Pima S-4 Cottonseed to Quality | 1974 | 1 |
| 12 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | Involving patients in their own safety | 2012 | 1 |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Jane Ward
Jane Ward is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Research in Cotton Cultivation (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (76 citations), Emergency Medical Services (66 citations), Pharmacy (43 citations), Family Practice (11 citations) and Health Information Management (21 citations). Jane Ward has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gerry Armitage, Rebecca Lawton, Reema Sirriyeh, Rosemary McEachan, Karen L. Ayres, Andrew Prestwich, Mark Conner, Ian Watt, John Wright and Elizabeth L Sampson. Their work appears in journals such as Health Expectations, BMC Geriatrics, British Journal of Health Psychology, BMC Primary Care and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.