Jane Starczynski

2.7k citations
48 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

    • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 12
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 10

Jane Starczynski

48 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Jane Starczynski
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Genetics 490
  • Cancer Research 452
  • Oncology 430
  • Physiology 39
  • Hematology 123
Replace Meixiao Long with:
Meixiao Long United States
Kari G. Chaffee United States
Catherine Richon France
Blanca González‐Farré Spain
Julie W. Reeser United States
Eliane Mery-Lamarche France
Daniela Richter Germany
Franco Caramia Australia
Heike Horn Germany
DuPont Guerry United States
Jane Starczynski relative to Meixiao Long United States Meixiao Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Meixiao Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Starczynski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Starczynski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Starczynski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Starczynski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Starczynski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Starczynski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Starczynski. The network helps show where Jane Starczynski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Starczynski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Starczynski Line = papers co-authored together Jane Starczynski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014219
2 2008201
3 2005193
4 2015188
5 2016121
6 200497
7 201984
8 200681
9 201371
10 200568
11 201264
12 200562
13 201159
14 200451
15 200448
16 200747
17 200344
18 202244
19 201038
20 200935

About Jane Starczynski

Jane Starczynski is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology, Cancer Research, Hematology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (12 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (4 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (490 citations), Cancer Research (452 citations), Oncology (430 citations), Physiology (39 citations) and Hematology (123 citations). Jane Starczynski has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chris Fegan, Guy Pratt, Chris J. Pepper, Ian Ogilvie Ellis, Andrew H.S. Lee, Emad A. Rakha, John M.S. Bartlett, Tatjana Stanković, Belinda Austen and Merdol Ibrahim. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Histopathology, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Leukemia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact