Jane Smith

27 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers

Jane Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Rehabilitation 327
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 128
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 93
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 113
Replace Brent Hodgkinson with:
Brent Hodgkinson Australia
Henry John Woodford United Kingdom
Hugh Carl Hanger New Zealand
Marie‐Josée Sirois Canada
Patricia A. Quigley United States
Monique A. A. Caljouw Netherlands
Daniel A. Habtemariam United States
Barbara Liu Canada
Zoe Jane McKeough Australia
Ming‐Yueh Chou Taiwan
Jane Smith relative to Brent Hodgkinson Australia Brent Hodgkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Brent Hodgkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Smith. The network helps show where Jane Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jane Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012229
2 2013172
3 200480
4 200973
5 200569
6 201364
7 201962
8 200939
9 201932
10 200528
11 201725
12 197724
13 201523
14 201214
15 202013
16 200113
17 201413
18 202012
19 20129
20 20188

About Jane Smith

Jane Smith is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (327 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (128 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (93 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (52 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (113 citations). Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John B. Young, Anne Förster, Lesley Brown, Peter Knapp, Allan O. House, John Wright, Sharon K. Inouye, John Green, Francine Cheater and Mary E. Godfrey. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Age and Ageing, Animal Production Science, BMC Geriatrics and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact