Jane Simpson

162 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Jane Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 701
  • Clinical Psychology 907
  • Neurology 534
  • Applied Psychology 163
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 621
Replace Rebecca E. Ready with:
Rebecca E. Ready United States
Siew Eng Chua Hong Kong
Harald Gündel Germany
E Deisenhammer Austria
Siegfried Gauggel Germany
Jane McGillivray Australia
Francesca Pacitti Italy
Rodolfo Rossi Italy
Anthony M. Paolo United States
Claudia Carmassi Italy
Jane Simpson relative to Rebecca E. Ready United States Rebecca E. Ready's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Rebecca E. Ready · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Simpson. The network helps show where Jane Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008130
2 2006128
3 2015119
4 2009110
5 1995102
6 2011100
7 200587
8 200887
9 201080
10 201274
11 201973
12 201072
13 200672
14 201867
15 200965
16 201465
17 201263
18 201560
19 202156
20 201355

About Jane Simpson

Jane Simpson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 171 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (18 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (18 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (701 citations), Clinical Psychology (907 citations), Neurology (534 citations), Applied Psychology (163 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (621 citations). Jane Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Geoffrey Overton, Fiona Juliet Rosalind Eccles, Craig D. Murray, Nicolò Zarotti, Alistair M. S. Smith, Philip A. Powell, Trevor J. Crawford, Sarah Butchard, Victoria Molyneaux and Rachel M. Msetfi. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Aging & Mental Health, Dementia, Psychology and Health and Psychology Health & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact