Jane O’Connell

558 citations
15 papers · 376 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jane O’Connell

15 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Jane O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • General Health Professions 225
  • Emergency Medicine 72
  • Emergency Medical Services 29
  • Health Information Management 18
Replace Natasha Jennings with:
Natasha Jennings Australia
Renée Charbonneau-Smith Canada
Mieke van der Biezen Netherlands
Helen Nielsen New Zealand
Christine Thrasher Canada
Birgitte Graverholt Norway
Laurie Zone-Smith United States
Anna Carin Wahlberg Sweden
Karsten Klingberg Switzerland
Dorothy J. Kergin Canada
Jane O’Connell relative to Natasha Jennings Australia Natasha Jennings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natasha Jennings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Connell. The network helps show where Jane O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jane O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Jane O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014165
2 201374
3 201228
4 201020
5 200718
6 201717
7 201414
8 201612
9 200711
10 201711
11 20142
12
Profiling emergency nurse practitioner service
20141
13 20121
14 20171
15
Diagnostic accuracy of risk stratification tools for patients with chest pain in the rural emergency department: A systematic review
20161

About Jane O’Connell

Jane O’Connell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (11 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (8 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), General Health Professions (225 citations), Emergency Medicine (72 citations), Emergency Medical Services (29 citations) and Health Information Management (18 citations). Jane O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and India. Frequent co-authors include Glenn Gardner, Stuart Clifford, Natasha Jennings, Amanda Fox, Anne Gardner, Fiona Coyer, Sandy Middleton, Rose McMaster, Sharon Hillege and Mônica Lanzoni Rossi. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Nursing Practice and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact