Jane Mummery
Impact in
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 4
- Co-authors
- Blake Peck (6 shared papers)Sally Wellard (1 shared paper)Richard Dazeley (1 shared paper)Cameron Foale (1 shared paper)Sally Firmin (1 shared paper)Peter Vamplew (1 shared paper)Robyn Cant (1 shared paper)Wendy Penney (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (7 papers)Nursing Inquiry (3 papers)Media International Australia (3 papers)Continuum (2 papers)Nursing Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Jane Mummery
35 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
- Research and Theory 5
- Safety Research 39
- Health Informatics 6
- Medical Terminology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Mummery
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Mummery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Mummery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Mummery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Mummery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Mummery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Mummery. The network helps show where Jane Mummery may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jane Mummery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 3 |
About Jane Mummery
Jane Mummery is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Genetics and Education, having authored 37 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Safety Research (39 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Jane Mummery has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Blake Peck, Sally Wellard, Richard Dazeley, Cameron Foale, Sally Firmin, Peter Vamplew, Robyn Cant, Wendy Penney, Simon Cooper and Mohammed Salman. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Nursing Inquiry, Media International Australia, Continuum and Nursing Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.