Jane Moore
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Religious studies top 5%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
- Short Stories in Global Literature 1
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
-
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 3
- Co-authors
- Catherine Belsey (1 shared paper)Jane Ogden (1 shared paper)Harry Minas (1 shared paper)Fiona M Walter (1 shared paper)H. N. COHEN (1 shared paper)John Strachan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Women s Writing (2 papers)Nineteenth-Century Literature (1 paper)Irish Studies Review (1 paper)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Moore
9 papers receiving 178 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Pharmacy 91
- Religious studies 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 63
- History 26
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Moore. The network helps show where Jane Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jane Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 111 | |
| 2 | The Feminist Reader: Essays in Gender and the Politics of Literary Criticism | 1989 | 64 |
| 3 | 2001 | 50 | |
| 4 | Ronan Kelly, Bard of Erin: The life of Thomas Moore (Dublin: Penguin Ireland, 2008) [Book Review] | 2012 | 5 |
| 5 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 6 | The satires of Thomas Moore | 2003 | 2 |
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 9 | Thomas Moore, Anacreon, and the romantic tradition | 2013 | 1 |
| 10 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 1 |
About Jane Moore
Jane Moore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, History, General Health Professions and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Historical Studies of British Isles (1 paper), Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper) and American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (91 citations), Religious studies (29 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations), History (26 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (52 citations). Jane Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Belsey, Jane Ogden, Harry Minas, Fiona M Walter, H. N. COHEN and John Strachan. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Writing, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Irish Studies Review, Patient Education and Counseling and ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.