Jane Mitchell Rees

25 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Jane Mitchell Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Clinical Psychology 603
  • Periodontics 104
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 59
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 77
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 40
Replace Isabel do Carmo with:
Isabel do Carmo Portugal
M. Susan Jay United States
Mônica Leila Portela de Santana Brazil
Ayfer Tezel Türkiye
Tatiana Papazian Lebanon
Masaharu Kagawa Japan
Mareike Mast Germany
O. G. Eiben Hungary
M. Sato Japan
Jane Mitchell Rees relative to Isabel do Carmo Portugal Isabel do Carmo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
Isabel do Carmo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Mitchell Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Mitchell Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Mitchell Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Mitchell Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Mitchell Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Mitchell Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Mitchell Rees. The network helps show where Jane Mitchell Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Mitchell Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Mitchell Rees Line = papers co-authored together Jane Mitchell Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995260
2 2003249
3 2003140
4 2006108
5 199646
6 201043
7 198732
8
Nutrition in adolescence
198428
9
Adolescent nutritional disorders : prevention and treatment
199724
10 198422
11 199916
12 198515
13 197312
14 199012
15 199711
16 19929
17
Report of a special panel on desired prenatal weight gains for underweight and normal weight women.
19908
18 19946
19 20066
20 19943

About Jane Mitchell Rees

Jane Mitchell Rees is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Public Health and Nutrition (3 papers) and Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (603 citations), Periodontics (104 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (77 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (40 citations). Jane Mitchell Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Neville H. Golden, Debra K. Katzman, Richard E. Kreipe, Ellen S. Rome, Susan Margaret Sawyer, Seth Ammerman, Dasha Nicholls, Martin Fisher, Harry M. Hoberman and Garry S. Sigman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, PEDIATRICS, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved and Pediatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact