Janet Schebendach

53 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Janet Schebendach
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Clinical Psychology 1.7k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 159
  • Applied Psychology 117
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 275
  • Pharmacy 87
Replace Gabriella Milos with:
Gabriella Milos Switzerland
Laurel Mayer United States
Nobuo Kiriike Japan
Jana González Gómez Spain
Linda Mustelin Finland
Tanja Legenbauer Germany
Kristian Holtkamp Germany
Øyvind Rø Norway
A. Wakeling United Kingdom
Barbara Mangweth Austria
Janet Schebendach relative to Gabriella Milos Switzerland Gabriella Milos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Gabriella Milos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Schebendach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Schebendach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Schebendach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Schebendach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Schebendach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Schebendach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Schebendach. The network helps show where Janet Schebendach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Schebendach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Schebendach Line = papers co-authored together Janet Schebendach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995245
2 2002165
3 2005156
4 2010121
5 200899
6 201197
7 199494
8 201187
9 201180
10 200572
11 200570
12 200462
13 200758
14
Eating disorders in adolescents. A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
199555
15 201151
16 201250
17 201949
18 201149
19 199748
20 200743

About Janet Schebendach

Janet Schebendach is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (44 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (10 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Celiac Disease Research and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.7k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (159 citations), Applied Psychology (117 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (275 citations) and Pharmacy (87 citations). Janet Schebendach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. Timothy Walsh, Neville H. Golden, Laurel Mayer, I. Ronald Shenker, Robyn Sysko, Joanna Steinglass, Evelyn Attia, Michael J. Devlin, Mark Z. Jacobson and Stanley Hertz. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Appetite, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact