Jane Klobas

118 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Jane Klobas
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Information Systems and Management 826
  • Business and International Management 185
  • Communication 501
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 410
  • Computer Science Applications 309
Replace Alton Y.K. Chua with:
Alton Y.K. Chua Singapore
Paul Attewell United States
Laurence Prusak United States
Eileen M. Trauth United States
Alvin Toffler
David A. Nadler United States
Ra’ed Masa’deh Jordan
Kai H. Lim Hong Kong
Bart van den Hooff Netherlands
Chun Wei Choo Canada
Jane Klobas relative to Alton Y.K. Chua Singapore Alton Y.K. Chua's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Alton Y.K. Chua · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Klobas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Klobas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Klobas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Klobas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Klobas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Klobas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Klobas. The network helps show where Jane Klobas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Klobas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Klobas Line = papers co-authored together Jane Klobas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008374
2 2013259
3 2019217
4 2003211
5 2005129
6 2018125
7 2011102
8 2014101
9 2000100
10 201795
11 199589
12 200388
13 201087
14 201971
15
Evaluating Collaborative Learning Processes Using System-Based Measurement.
200767
16 200465
17 200762
18 201458
19 201556
20 201856

About Jane Klobas

Jane Klobas is a scholar working on Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 133 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (29 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (26 papers), Online and Blended Learning (18 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (13 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (11 papers), Web and Library Services (10 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (8 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (826 citations), Business and International Management (185 citations), Communication (501 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (410 citations) and Computer Science Applications (309 citations). Jane Klobas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Tanya McGill, Icek Ajzen, Tariq Ahmed, Valerie Hobbs, VGR Chandran, Paul Jackson, Stefano Renzi, Laurel A. Clyde, Lars Dommermuth and Trude Lappegård. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, The Electronic Library, Information Technology and People, Library & Information Science Research and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact