David Lim

400 papers receiving 10.5k citations

Peers

David Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Otorhinolaryngology 3.1k
  • Sensory Systems 2.8k
  • Microbiology 1.2k
  • Neurology 1.2k
  • Developmental Biology 128
Replace Richard J. Smith with:
Richard J. Smith United States
Steve D. M. Brown United Kingdom
Mary‐Claire King United States
Eric D. Green United States
Juha Kere Finland
Newton E. Morton United States
Robert H. Miller United States
Stephen W. Scherer Canada
Michael J. Kelley United States
D.N. Cooper United Kingdom
David Lim relative to Richard J. Smith United States Richard J. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.0×
Richard J. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lim. The network helps show where David Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Lim Line = papers co-authored together David Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 421 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986344
2 2003273
3 2001232
4 1985209
5 2007200
6 1992195
7 1980189
8 1970184
9 1975164
10 1972159
11 1971144
12 1971141
13 2002140
14 1983139
15 2002136
16 1968127
17 1994126
18 1973125
19 1986122
20 2004120

About David Lim

David Lim is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Microbiology, having authored 421 papers that have together received 11.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (93 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (47 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (25 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (24 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (23 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (23 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (22 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (3.1k citations), Sensory Systems (2.8k citations), Microbiology (1.2k citations), Neurology (1.2k citations) and Developmental Biology (128 citations). David Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. DeMaria, Herbert G. Birck, William H. Saunders, Matti Anniko, Federico Kalinec, B Hussl, Jiandong Li, Lauren O. Bakaletz, Paul Webster and Michael M. Paparella. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, American Journal of Otolaryngology, The Journal of Urology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact