Jane Guiller

15 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

Jane Guiller
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Communication 106
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 115
  • Human-Computer Interaction 48
  • Education 230
  • Computer Science Applications 43
Replace Becky Herr Stephenson with:
Becky Herr Stephenson
Stephanie Vie United States
Matteo Bittanti Italy
Mohamad Jafre Zainol Abidin Malaysia
Sandra Hughes‐Hassell United States
Caroline Pelletier United Kingdom
Josh McCarthy Australia
Tina Matuchniak United States
Eliza T. Dresang United States
Bettina Fabos United States
Jane Guiller relative to Becky Herr Stephenson Becky Herr Stephenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Becky Herr Stephenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Guiller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Guiller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Guiller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Guiller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Guiller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Guiller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Guiller. The network helps show where Jane Guiller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jane Guiller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Guiller Line = papers co-authored together Jane Guiller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2007125
2 201280
3 200674
4 200662
5 201359
6
Learning from Digital Natives: Integrating Formal and Informal Learning
200755
7 201437
8
Learning from Digital Natives: Bridging Formal and Informal Learning. Final Report
200828
9 20129
10 20243
11 20243
12 20062
13 20242
14 20232
15 20072
16 20110
17 20250
18 20210

About Jane Guiller

Jane Guiller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Communication, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (106 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (115 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (48 citations), Education (230 citations) and Computer Science Applications (43 citations). Jane Guiller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alan Durndell, Mark Brosnan, Jeff Gavin, Pam Maras, Richard Joiner, John Cromby, Allison Littlejohn, Anoush Margaryan, David Nicol and Caroline Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts and Journal of Educational Computing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact