Jane Griffiths

3.0k citations
91 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Griffiths

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jane Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 68
  • Research and Theory 33
  • Family Practice 49
  • General Health Professions 487
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 479
Replace Ruta Valaitis with:
Ruta Valaitis Canada
Jamileh Farokhzadian Iran
Bronwynne C. Evans United States
Carmel Bradshaw Ireland
Catrin Evans United Kingdom
Annie Topping United Kingdom
Gail Armstrong United States
Michelle Kelly Australia
Abbey Hyde Ireland
Nancy Sullivan United States
Jane Griffiths relative to Ruta Valaitis Canada Ruta Valaitis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ruta Valaitis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Griffiths. The network helps show where Jane Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together Jane Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005176
2 2003118
3 2013108
4 201165
5 202163
6 200058
7 201556
8 201153
9 200151
10 201549
11 201543
12 201035
13 201533
14 200733
15 199333
16 202131
17 201231
18 200430
19 201929
20 201427

About Jane Griffiths

Jane Griffiths is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Education, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Nursing education and management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (68 citations), Research and Theory (33 citations), Family Practice (49 citations), General Health Professions (487 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (479 citations). Jane Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Schultz, Gail Ewing, Karen Luker, Rosamund Bryar, S. José Closs, Simon Campbell, Karina Lovell, Karen Kemp, Laura April McEwen and Margaret Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, PLoS ONE, Palliative Medicine, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact