Jane Goodwin

798 citations
30 papers · 487 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Goodwin

27 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Jane Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 75
  • Genetics 152
  • Archeology 55
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 82
Replace Melanie Heyworth with:
Melanie Heyworth Australia
Michelle Hamilton United States
Craig A. Cunningham United States
Liming Zhou China
Diana Weiting Tan Australia
Jenny García Valencia Colombia
Mirella Dragone Italy
Barış Özener Türkiye
Jill E. Scott United States
Michel Bénézech France
Jane Goodwin relative to Melanie Heyworth Australia Melanie Heyworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Melanie Heyworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Goodwin. The network helps show where Jane Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Jane Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010158
2 202231
3 201426
4 201926
5 201625
6 201720
7 202220
8 202116
9 201714
10 202314
11 202114
12 201913
13 202012
14 201811
15 201810
16 202410
17 201910
18 20189
19 20179
20 20218

About Jane Goodwin

Jane Goodwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (128 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (75 citations), Genetics (152 citations), Archeology (55 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations). Jane Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda Campbell, Lynne McCormack, Patricia Balaresque, Mark A. Jobling, Carlo Previderé, Georgina R. Bowden, Guido Barbujani, Chris Tyler‐Smith, Jean-Paul Moisan and Susan M. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Child Care Health and Development, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Psychology in the Schools, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact