Jane Goodwin

832 citations
33 papers · 541 · h-index 14

Impact in

    • Family and Disability Support Research
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Forensic and Genetic Research
    • Genetic diversity and population structure

Papers in

Jane Goodwin

30 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Jane Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Genetics 167
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 84
  • Archeology 58
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 94
Replace Jae‐Hyun Kim with:
Jae‐Hyun Kim Australia
Barış Özener Türkiye
Melanie Heyworth Australia
Michelle Hamilton United States
Craig A. Cunningham United States
Andrea R. Simon United States
Paul L. Jamison United States
Kathryn A. Smith United States
Patricia Montoya Colombia
Kenneth A. Richman United States
Jane Goodwin relative to Jae‐Hyun Kim Australia Jae‐Hyun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Jae‐Hyun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Goodwin. The network helps show where Jane Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Jane Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010173
2 202238
3 201429
4 201928
5 201626
6 202223
7 201721
8 202316
9 202116
10 201715
11 201914
12 202414
13 202014
14 202114
15 201811
16 201811
17 201810
18 201910
19 20179
20 20218

About Jane Goodwin

Jane Goodwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (10 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers) and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (137 citations), Genetics (167 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (84 citations), Archeology (58 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations). Jane Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Linda Elisabet Campbell, Jill Cadwgan, Lynne McCormack, Carlo Previderé, Chris Tyler‐Smith, Ian Wilson, Andrew G. Demaine, Georgina R. Bowden, Mark A. Jobling and Patricia L. Balaresque. Their work appears in journals such as Child Care Health and Development, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Health Technology Assessment, Autism and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact