Jane E. Royalty

16 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Jane E. Royalty
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 13
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 61
  • Pharmacology 52
Replace Paola Lai with:
Paola Lai Italy
Michiyo Yamano Japan
Mayumi Yamano Japan
Amy K. Banes United States
Fuka Aizawa Japan
Yoshiyuki Sakai Japan
Yuma T. Ortiz United States
Nicolas Simon France
R.Patricia Bogdanovic Canada
Yuki Kawasaki Japan
Jane E. Royalty relative to Paola Lai Italy Paola Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Paola Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Royalty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Royalty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Royalty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Royalty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Royalty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Royalty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Royalty. The network helps show where Jane E. Royalty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Royalty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Royalty Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Royalty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201892
2 201485
3 200835
4 201334
5 202018
6 201516
7 200916
8 201015
9 200613
10 198611
11 20159
12 20235
13 20134
14 20164
15 20102
16 20111
17 20161

About Jane E. Royalty

Jane E. Royalty is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (3 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper), Heat shock proteins research (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (13 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (61 citations) and Pharmacology (52 citations). Jane E. Royalty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include P. Kellie Turner, Palaniappan Kulanthaivel, Stephen David Hall, Alan Y. Chiang, Joseph Vincent Bonventre, James A. Bacon, Y. Anne Pak, Randall R. Stoltz, Celedon R. Gonzales and Linda Rorick‐Kehn. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Platelets, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics and Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact