Jane E. Kelley

502 citations
16 papers · 394 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Kelley

16 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Jane E. Kelley
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Social Psychology 173
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Conservation 20
  • Clinical Psychology 104
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 60
Replace Adam Blatner with:
Adam Blatner United States
Karen E. Shackleford United States
Christian Rœsler Switzerland
Mary Griffin United Kingdom
Emanuela Calandri Italy
Kevin Aho United States
Richard B. Makover United States
Andrée L. Castonguay Canada
Alexander Batthyány United States
Whitney A. Sedgwick Canada
Jane E. Kelley relative to Adam Blatner United States Adam Blatner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Adam Blatner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Kelley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Kelley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Kelley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Kelley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Kelley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Kelley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Kelley. The network helps show where Jane E. Kelley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Kelley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Kelley Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Kelley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1997154
2 1997130
3 201620
4
Depictions and Gaps: Portrayal of U.S. Poverty in Realistic Fiction Children's Picture Books.
201114
5 200814
6
From recipes to recetas: health beliefs and health care encounters in the rural Dominican Republic.
199911
7 202011
8 20078
9 19977
10 20206
11 20186
12
vDSM-5 autism spectrum disorder symptomology in fictional picture books
20155
13 20193
14
Fictional Narratives about Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Focus Group Analysis and Insight
20162
15 20062
16 20231

About Jane E. Kelley

Jane E. Kelley is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 16 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (2 papers), Mental Health via Writing (2 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (173 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Conservation (20 citations), Clinical Psychology (104 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (60 citations). Jane E. Kelley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Lumley, James C. C. Leisen, Teresa Cardon, Brenda L. Barrio, Yun‐Ju Hsiao, Carol A. Patsdaughter and Katharine Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Education and training in autism and developmental disabilities, Journal of Health Psychology, The Elementary School Journal and Environment Development and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact