Jane Dewar

1.2k citations
29 papers · 950 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Dewar

27 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Jane Dewar
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Physiology 404
  • Molecular Medicine 48
  • Animal Science and Zoology 94
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 244
  • Pharmacology 70
Replace George Bensch with:
George Bensch United States
Luís Menchén Spain
Runxiang Xie China
Hang Liu China
Na Zang China
Kerry A. Lymn Australia
Yael Haberman Israel
Regina Engelhardt Germany
M.T. Lopez-Vidriero United Kingdom
Martin Kankam United States
Jane Dewar relative to George Bensch United States George Bensch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
George Bensch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dewar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dewar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dewar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dewar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dewar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dewar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dewar. The network helps show where Jane Dewar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Dewar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Dewar Line = papers co-authored together Jane Dewar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997270
2 2000138
3 1997134
4 201588
5 199871
6 200155
7 201631
8 201830
9 201927
10 201423
11 201814
12 197214
13 200311
14 20209
15 20175
16 20155
17 19974
18 20174
19 20213
20 20023

About Jane Dewar

Jane Dewar is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Speech and Hearing and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (14 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (6 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (404 citations), Molecular Medicine (48 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (94 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (244 citations) and Pharmacology (70 citations). Jane Dewar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ian P. Hall, Brian J. Lipworth, Eleanor Dow, Amanda Wheatley, Anastasios Gazis, John R. Cockcroft, Joseph P. Noon, Píetro Lió, Newton E. Morton and Stephen T. Holgate. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, The Lancet, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CHEST Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact