H. Barr
Impact in
- Biophysics top 2%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Papers in
-
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 1
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 1
- Co-authors
- H. G. M. Edwards (1 shared paper)Lin‐P'ing Choo‐Smith (1 shared paper)G.J. Puppels (1 shared paper)Jonathan Lee Brown (1 shared paper)Anthony P.F. Turner (1 shared paper)Alexandros Pavlou (1 shared paper)Naresh Magan (1 shared paper)Conrad Bessant (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biosensors and Bioelectronics (1 paper)Biopolymers (1 paper)British journal of surgery (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
H. Barr
6 papers receiving 375 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Biophysics 167
- Analytical Chemistry 116
- Sensory Systems 15
- Biomedical Engineering 134
- Insect Science 29
Countries citing papers authored by H. Barr
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Barr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Barr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Barr. The network helps show where H. Barr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside H. Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 79 | |
| 4 | Sniffing out disease using the artificial nose. | 2001 | 2 |
| 5 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 6 | OPTIMISING FIELD PROVING AND DEVELOPMENT | 1985 | 1 |
About H. Barr
H. Barr is a scholar working on Insect Science, Sensory Systems, Biophysics, Analytical Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 6 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (1 paper), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (167 citations), Analytical Chemistry (116 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations), Biomedical Engineering (134 citations) and Insect Science (29 citations). H. Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. G. M. Edwards, Lin‐P'ing Choo‐Smith, G.J. Puppels, Jonathan Lee Brown, Anthony P.F. Turner, Alexandros Pavlou, Naresh Magan, Conrad Bessant, Grant Grant and Selwayan Saini. Their work appears in journals such as Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Biopolymers, British journal of surgery, PubMed and OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.