Jane Day

564 citations
9 papers · 238 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
    • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Papers in

Jane Day

9 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Jane Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Paleontology 148
  • Anthropology 154
  • Archeology 14
  • Archeology 50
  • Geography, Planning and Development 19
Replace Colin Burgess with:
Colin Burgess United Kingdom
Richard Jefferies United States
Vivían Scheinsohn Argentina
Elton R. Prewitt United States
Eileen L. Camilli United States
Alex W. Barker United States
Rebecca Dean United States
Cynthia Irwin‐Williams United States
Jacob Holland‐Lulewicz United States
William W. Wasley United States
Jane Day relative to Colin Burgess United Kingdom Colin Burgess's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Colin Burgess · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Day. The network helps show where Jane Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jane Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Day Line = papers co-authored together Jane Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies
1992159
2 199736
3
Ancient traditions : shamanism in central Asia and the Americas
199417
4 201015
5 19964
6 19943
7
Changing Lives: Voices from a School That Works
19942
8 19941
9 19941

About Jane Day

Jane Day is a scholar working on Anthropology, Paleontology, Archeology, Molecular Biology and Museology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Anthropological Studies and Insights (1 paper), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (1 paper), Latin American history and culture (1 paper) and Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (148 citations), Anthropology (154 citations), Archeology (14 citations), Archeology (50 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (19 citations). Jane Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dennis J. Stanford, Milton R. Brown, Adam Schiavi, Erasmo M. Perera, Stuart A. Stein, Richard J. Bartlett, Margaret Eidson, Michael Pateman, Robert Carr and L. Baumbach. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, Journal of Field Archaeology and Museum Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact