Museum Anthropology

539 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 539 papers published in Museum Anthropology in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Museum Anthropology usually cover Museology (293 papers), Archeology (171 papers) and Anthropology (112 papers) specifically the topics of Museums and Cultural Heritage (280 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (154 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Museum Anthropology are Richard Handler, Jeffrey D. Feldman, Robin Boast, Aldona Jonaitis, Virginia R. Domínguez, Ian Tattersall, Peter Mark, Michael M. Ames, Erve Chambers and Frank J. Korom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Museum Anthropology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Museum Anthropology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Museum Anthropology.

Countries where authors publish in Museum Anthropology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Museum Anthropology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Museum Anthropology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Museum Anthropology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025