Jane Carter

26 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Jane Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 112
  • Rehabilitation 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 23
  • Clinical Psychology 106
Replace Jana J. Peterson with:
Jana J. Peterson United States
Celina H. Shirazipour Canada
Ricardo Cartes‐Velásquez Chile
Michelle Segar United States
Cathy Evans Canada
Barbara Berman United States
Gayatri Kembhavi United Kingdom
Tomasz Tasiemski Poland
Miriam Reiner Germany
Andrea T. Underhill United States
Jane Carter relative to Jana J. Peterson United States Jana J. Peterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jana J. Peterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Carter. The network helps show where Jane Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Carter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003247
2 198979
3 200458
4 198833
5
Alley farming: have resource-poor farmers benefited?
199532
6 200931
7 200928
8 199323
9 200913
10 198912
11 200910
12 202010
13 20199
14 20207
15 20187
16 19905
17 19853
18 20193
19 19973
20 20212

About Jane Carter

Jane Carter is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (112 citations), Rehabilitation (57 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). Jane Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include George Sugai, Luigi Tesio, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Gunnar Grimby, Anna Maria Simone, Črt Marinček, Gemma Lawton, Suzanne Phillips, Åsa Lundgren‐Nilsson and Massimo Penta. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Energy Policy and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact