Jane Carter

811 citations
26 papers · 626 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Carter

26 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Jane Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 106
  • Rehabilitation 32
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 70
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 17
Replace Toni L. Williams with:
Toni L. Williams United Kingdom
Roberto Jerônimo dos Santos Silva Brazil
Javier Brazo‐Sayavera Spain
Lars Hagberg Sweden
Joanne Hudson United Kingdom
Celina H. Shirazipour Canada
Neil Howlett United Kingdom
Bettina Bringolf‐Isler Switzerland
Katie Morton United Kingdom
Christopher Shields Canada
Jane Carter relative to Toni L. Williams United Kingdom Toni L. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Toni L. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Carter. The network helps show where Jane Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Carter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003246
2 198979
3 200459
4 198833
5
Alley farming: have resource-poor farmers benefited?
199532
6 200931
7 200928
8 199323
9 200913
10 198912
11 202010
12 200910
13 20199
14 20207
15 20187
16 19905
17 19973
18 20193
19 20233
20 19853

About Jane Carter

Jane Carter is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (106 citations), Rehabilitation (32 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (70 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (17 citations). Jane Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include George Sugai, Gunnar Grimby, Haim Ring, Massimo Penta, Luigi Tesio, Anna Maria Simone, Gemma Lawton, Črt Marinček, Åsa Lundgren‐Nilsson and Alan Tennant. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Qualitative Health Research, Literacy, Medical Care and Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact