Haim Ring

113 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Haim Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Rehabilitation 1.9k
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 726
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 897
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 710
  • Occupational Therapy 160
Replace Eline Lindeman with:
Eline Lindeman Netherlands
Johanna M. A. Visser‐Meily Netherlands
Luigi Tesio Italy
Virgil G. Mathiowetz United States
Marco Franceschini Italy
Craig A. Velozo United States
Axel R. Fugl‐Meyer Sweden
E. Diane Playford United Kingdom
Sarah F. Tyson United Kingdom
Erwin E. H. van Wegen Netherlands
Haim Ring relative to Eline Lindeman Netherlands Eline Lindeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Eline Lindeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haim Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haim Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haim Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haim Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haim Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haim Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haim Ring. The network helps show where Haim Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Haim Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haim Ring Line = papers co-authored together Haim Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997415
2 1999375
3 2004355
4 2007308
5 2003256
6 2007242
7 2002196
8 2007173
9 2010169
10 2005157
11 2004140
12
Standing sway and weight-bearing distribution in people with below-knee amputations.
1992133
13 1997121
14 2009113
15 1989107
16 2008102
17 200899
18 200692
19 200590
20 200184

About Haim Ring

Haim Ring is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 115 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (48 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (16 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (10 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (4 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.9k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (726 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (897 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (710 citations) and Occupational Therapy (160 citations). Haim Ring has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nachum Soroker, Noomi Katz, Iuly Treger, Adina Maeir, Jeffrey Shames, Malka Itzkovich, Amiram Catz, Ada Tamir, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff and Salvatore Giaquinto. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact