Jane Bradburn
Impact in
- Medical Terminology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 1
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Sandy Oliver (3 shared papers)Jo Marsden (1 shared paper)Marcia Kelson (1 shared paper)Bec Hanley (1 shared paper)Clare Evans (1 shared paper)Alistair Kent (1 shared paper)Sarah Thomas (1 shared paper)Heather Goodare (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Expectations (2 papers)Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)Evaluation (1 paper)Palliative Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Bradburn
9 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Medical Terminology 3
- General Health Professions 270
- Sensory Systems 34
- Complementary and alternative medicine 31
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 61
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bradburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bradburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bradburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bradburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bradburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bradburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bradburn. The network helps show where Jane Bradburn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bradburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Involving the public in NHS public health, and social care research: briefing notes for researchers | 2004 | 239 |
| 2 | 2001 | 88 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 8 | Breaking bad news : establishing an auditable procedure for giving the cancer diagnosis | 1996 | 9 |
| 9 | Consulting consumers. Only human. | 1996 | 1 |
About Jane Bradburn
Jane Bradburn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (3 citations), General Health Professions (270 citations), Sensory Systems (34 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (31 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (61 citations). Jane Bradburn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sandy Oliver, Jo Marsden, Marcia Kelson, Bec Hanley, Clare Evans, Alistair Kent, Sarah Thomas, Heather Goodare, Ruairidh Milne and Phyll Buchanan. Their work appears in journals such as Health Expectations, Clinical Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, Evaluation and Palliative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.