JaneMaree Maher

144 papers receiving 3.2k citations

JaneMaree Maher's Hit Papers

Improved models of care for cancer survivors 2022 · 129 citations
1290+1+2Years since publication4080120

Peers

JaneMaree Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Oncology 1.2k
  • Gender Studies 293
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 819
  • Pharmacy 136
  • Dermatology 226
Replace Diana Harcourt with:
Diana Harcourt United Kingdom
Elliot J. Coups United States
Jon Kerner United States
Myriam Khlat France
Mark Hill United Kingdom
Terrance L. Albrecht United States
Margaret I. Fitch Canada
Jeff Dunn Australia
Aimee S. James United States
Cheryl Alexander United States
JaneMaree Maher relative to Diana Harcourt United Kingdom Diana Harcourt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Diana Harcourt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JaneMaree Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JaneMaree Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JaneMaree Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JaneMaree Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JaneMaree Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JaneMaree Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JaneMaree Maher. The network helps show where JaneMaree Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JaneMaree Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JaneMaree Maher Line = papers co-authored together JaneMaree Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 156 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005431
2
Improved models of care for cancer survivors
Hit paper breakdown →
2022129
3 1996127
4 2012115
5 2002101
6 201092
7 200389
8 200786
9 200275
10 200475
11 201975
12 200071
13 200168
14 201566
15 201966
16 200161
17 201061
18
Caring for the Dying at Home: Companions on the Journey
200355
19 198854
20 200949

About JaneMaree Maher

JaneMaree Maher is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Oncology, Gender Studies and Health, having authored 156 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (19 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (14 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (11 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers) and Family Support in Illness (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.2k citations), Gender Studies (293 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (819 citations), Pharmacy (136 citations) and Dermatology (226 citations). JaneMaree Maher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Arshi Denton, Jan Wright, Suzanne Fraser, Jo Lindsay, Michael Jefford, Kate Fitz‐Gibbon, Jude McCulloch, Lise Saugères, Claire Tanner and Neil K. Aaronson. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Cancer, Palliative Medicine, Familial Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact