JaneMaree Maher

157 papers receiving 3.4k citations

JaneMaree Maher's Hit Papers

Improved models of care for cancer survivors 2022 · 144 citations
1440+1+2Years since publication4080120

Peers

JaneMaree Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Oncology 966
  • Gender Studies 331
  • Pharmacy 136
  • Health 213
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 523
Replace Alison Chapple with:
Alison Chapple United Kingdom
Terrance L. Albrecht United States
Jon Kerner United States
Suzanne K. Chambers Australia
Chanita Hughes Halbert United States
Joan R. Bloom United States
Lorna Weir Canada
Victoria White Australia
Suzanne E. Scott United Kingdom
Steven J. Katz United States
JaneMaree Maher relative to Alison Chapple United Kingdom Alison Chapple's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Alison Chapple · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JaneMaree Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JaneMaree Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JaneMaree Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JaneMaree Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JaneMaree Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JaneMaree Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JaneMaree Maher. The network helps show where JaneMaree Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JaneMaree Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JaneMaree Maher Line = papers co-authored together JaneMaree Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 170 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005442
2
Improved models of care for cancer survivors
Hit paper breakdown →
2022144
3 1996128
4 2012120
5 2002108
6 2003101
7 2010101
8 200795
9 200485
10 200284
11 201982
12 200182
13 200076
14 201969
15 201567
16 201065
17 198858
18
Caring for the Dying at Home: Companions on the Journey
200356
19 200950
20 201150

About JaneMaree Maher

JaneMaree Maher is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Health, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 170 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (20 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (966 citations), Gender Studies (331 citations), Pharmacy (136 citations), Health (213 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (523 citations). JaneMaree Maher has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Arshi Denton, Jan Wright, Suzanne Fraser, Kate Fitz‐Gibbon, Jo Lindsay, Jude McCulloch, Michael Jefford, Lise Saugères, Catherine M. Alfano and Claire Tanner. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Palliative Medicine, Familial Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact