Jan Wågermark

400 citations
14 papers · 299 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Wågermark

14 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Jan Wågermark
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Gastroenterology 54
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 71
  • Nephrology 23
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 59
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 76
Replace W Zaunbauer with:
W Zaunbauer Switzerland
Minoru Kashiwagi Japan
Anne Kehely United Kingdom
Aurelio Negro Italy
O Llanos Chile
M. Brandsborg Denmark
Harold A. Zintel United States
Ivi-Mai Schöön Sweden
P Daggett United States
André Gut Switzerland
Jan Wågermark relative to W Zaunbauer Switzerland W Zaunbauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
W Zaunbauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wågermark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wågermark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wågermark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wågermark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wågermark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wågermark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wågermark. The network helps show where Jan Wågermark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jan Wågermark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Wågermark Line = papers co-authored together Jan Wågermark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 196873
2 197050
3 198044
4 196743
5 198239
6 199311
7 196811
8 196611
9 19936
10
Brush cytology is superior to biopsies obtained by a new device in bile duct strictures.
20075
11 19692
12
Acute "idiopathic" pancreatitis. A post-mortem etiological study.
19682
13 19681
14 19671

About Jan Wågermark

Jan Wågermark is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology, Gastroenterology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Celiac Disease Research and Management (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (2 papers), Microscopic Colitis (2 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper) and Cancer Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (54 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (71 citations), Nephrology (23 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (59 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (76 citations). Jan Wågermark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Arne Ljungqvist, Urban Ungerstedt, Lars Stenhammar, Jan Wersäll, Juha Nickels, Bjørn Risberg, Agnieszka Brandt, C.‐A. Hamberger, Lotta Högberg and Lars Rydberg. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, Cancer, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Circulation Research and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact