Jan Rummel

2.0k citations
79 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Rummel

72 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jan Rummel
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 661
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 798
  • Applied Psychology 83
  • General Decision Sciences 33
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 195
Replace Jill Talley Shelton with:
Jill Talley Shelton United States
Tyler L. Harrison United States
Diane Berish United States
Jennifer C. McVay United States
Gregory J. Spillers United States
Dayna R. Touron United States
Kenny L. Hicks United States
M. Kathryn Bleckley United States
Giulia Buodo Italy
Lauren L. Richmond United States
Jan Rummel relative to Jill Talley Shelton United States Jill Talley Shelton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jill Talley Shelton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Rummel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Rummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Rummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Rummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Rummel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Rummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Rummel. The network helps show where Jan Rummel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Rummel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Rummel Line = papers co-authored together Jan Rummel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014130
2 202064
3 202064
4 200954
5 201349
6 201148
7 201647
8 201943
9 201240
10 201337
11 201935
12 201933
13 201627
14 201427
15 201325
16 202223
17 201523
18 202023
19 201622
20 201621

About Jan Rummel

Jan Rummel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Computer Networks and Communications and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (30 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (27 papers), Mind wandering and attention (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers) and Age of Information Optimization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (661 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (798 citations), Applied Psychology (83 citations), General Decision Sciences (33 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (195 citations). Jan Rummel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. Dennis Boywitt, Thorsten Meiser, Lia Kvavilashvili, Beatrice G. Kuhlmann, Anna‐Lena Schubert, Chris Englert, Meike Kroneisen, Edgar Erdfelder, Dirk Hagemann and Christoph Löffler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Memory & Cognition, Consciousness and Cognition, Psychological Research and Memory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact