Jan Rummel

2.0k citations
86 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Rummel

79 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jan Rummel
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 728
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 880
  • Applied Psychology 93
  • General Decision Sciences 32
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 225
Replace Jill Talley Shelton with:
Jill Talley Shelton United States
Tyler L. Harrison United States
Diane E. Berish United States
Jennifer C. McVay United States
Gregory J. Spillers United States
Christina Röcke Switzerland
Dayna R. Touron United States
Alexandru D. Iordan United States
Angelika Marlene Stefan Netherlands
M. Kathryn Bleckley United States
Jan Rummel relative to Jill Talley Shelton United States Jill Talley Shelton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Jill Talley Shelton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Rummel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Rummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Rummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Rummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Rummel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Rummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Rummel. The network helps show where Jan Rummel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Rummel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Rummel Line = papers co-authored together Jan Rummel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014138
2 200969
3 202067
4 202065
5 201156
6 201955
7 201352
8 201650
9 201243
10 201341
11 201937
12 201937
13 201632
14 201430
15 201527
16 202226
17 201325
18 202025
19 201624
20 201624

About Jan Rummel

Jan Rummel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Psychiatry and Mental health and Applied Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (33 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (31 papers), Mind wandering and attention (20 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (11 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Age of Information Optimization (7 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (728 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (880 citations), Applied Psychology (93 citations), General Decision Sciences (32 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (225 citations). Jan Rummel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. Dennis Boywitt, Thorsten Meiser, Lia Kvavilashvili, Beatrice G. Kuhlmann, Anna‐Lena Schubert, Chris Englert, Meike Kroneisen, Edgar Erdfelder, Dirk Hagemann and Annette Sterr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Consciousness and Cognition, Memory & Cognition, Psychological Research and Memory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact