James Wren

26 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

James Wren
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Small Animals 63
  • Pharmacy 26
  • Cancer Research 75
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 154
  • Reproductive Medicine 37
Replace Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein with:
Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein Belgium
H. Anthony Pattinson Canada
Doğa Türkkahraman Türkiye
Matthew T. Rätsep Canada
Stephanie Power Canada
John Germak United States
JA Russell Canada
Cynthia Dela Cruz Brazil
Ilpo Kinnunen Finland
Paula Rodríguez Spain
James Wren relative to Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein Belgium Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Wren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Wren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Wren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Wren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Wren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Wren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Wren. The network helps show where James Wren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Wren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Wren Line = papers co-authored together James Wren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012173
2 2000137
3 201738
4 201319
5 202015
6 202010
7 202110
8 20216
9 20226
10 20216
11 20225
12 20194
13 20204
14 20203
15 20233
16 20182
17 20232
18 20222
19 20212
20 20202

About James Wren

James Wren is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (63 citations), Pharmacy (26 citations), Cancer Research (75 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (154 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (37 citations). James Wren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Paul Russo, Jonathan Coleman, Martin H. Voss, Ying‐Bei Chen, Emily H. Cheng, Mithat Gönen, Han Liu, Robert J. Motzer, Shugaku Takeda and Omar Abdel‐Wahab. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, The Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and BMC Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact