James Webbe

779 citations
24 papers · 424 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Webbe

23 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

James Webbe
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 101
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 71
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 79
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 9
Replace Connie Williams with:
Connie Williams Canada
Maria Albertina Santiago Rego Brazil
Kate Williams United Kingdom
Ali Jalali United States
Sena Jawad United Kingdom
Ilona Zagożdżon Poland
Laurel Williams United States
Fiona Dickinson United Kingdom
Anna B. Hedstrom United States
L. Hidalgo Spain
James Webbe relative to Connie Williams Canada Connie Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Connie Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Webbe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Webbe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Webbe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Webbe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Webbe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Webbe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Webbe. The network helps show where James Webbe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Webbe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Webbe Line = papers co-authored together James Webbe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019142
2 201785
3 201757
4 201830
5 201924
6 201618
7 202011
8 202010
9 20239
10 20218
11 20196
12 20243
13 20193
14 20233
15
The importance of core outcome sets and developing one for neonatal care
20172
16 20222
17 20222
18 20202
19 20222
20 20202

About James Webbe

James Webbe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Delphi Technique in Research (10 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (101 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (71 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (79 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (9 citations). James Webbe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Gale, Neena Modi, Ginny Brunton, Ian Sinha, James MN Duffy, Jos M. Latour, Marian Knight, Nigel Hall, J A Nycyk and Elsa Afonso. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Paediatrics Open, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, BMJ Open, Trials and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact