James W. Garson
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 11
- Neural Networks and Applications 4
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 9
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Rescher (2 shared papers)Farrokh Mistree (2 shared papers)Paul R. Swank (1 shared paper)Barbara R. Foorman (1 shared paper)Hajime Yoshida (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Philosophical Logic (6 papers)Philosophical Psychology (5 papers)Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (3 papers)Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2 papers)Theoria (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James W. Garson
30 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- History and Philosophy of Science 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 83
- Philosophy 52
- Artificial Intelligence 138
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Garson
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Garson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Garson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Garson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Garson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Garson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Garson. The network helps show where James W. Garson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside James W. Garson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 2 |
About James W. Garson
James W. Garson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (4 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (83 citations), Philosophy (52 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (138 citations). James W. Garson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Rescher, Farrokh Mistree, Paul R. Swank, Barbara R. Foorman and Hajime Yoshida. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Philosophical Psychology, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Theoria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.