James T. Blankemeyer

15 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

James T. Blankemeyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Food Science 176
  • Plant Science 132
  • Insect Science 26
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 34
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 25
Replace Takayasu Motoyama with:
Takayasu Motoyama Japan
Li QiQin China
Manmohan M. Laloraya India
José Thalles Lacerda Brazil
Elizabeth Maria Talá de Souza Brazil
Rahel Park Italy
I. A. Khan Pakistan
H. Wagner Germany
Antonio A. Sekul United States
Maria Gabriella Siragusa Italy
James T. Blankemeyer relative to Takayasu Motoyama Japan Takayasu Motoyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Takayasu Motoyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Blankemeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Blankemeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Blankemeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Blankemeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Blankemeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Blankemeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Blankemeyer. The network helps show where James T. Blankemeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside James T. Blankemeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James T. Blankemeyer Line = papers co-authored together James T. Blankemeyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199873
2 199753
3 199242
4 199535
5 197830
6 198923
7 200417
8 199716
9 200011
10 19785
11 19805
12 19934
13 19902
14 19951
15 19781

About James T. Blankemeyer

James T. Blankemeyer is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Potato Plant Research (6 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (176 citations), Plant Science (132 citations), Insect Science (26 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (34 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (25 citations). James T. Blankemeyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mendel Friedman, James R. Rayburn, Michael McWilliams, William R. Harvey, Martin Weissenberg, Joshua B. White, Saba Shahin, John A. Bantle, Paulo A. Melo and Charlotte L. Ownby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact