James Syce

27 papers receiving 770 citations

Peers

James Syce
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Pharmacology 127
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 113
  • Pharmaceutical Science 58
  • Forestry 32
  • Plant Science 284
Replace Philip F. Uzor with:
Philip F. Uzor Nigeria
Challa Madhusudhana Chetty India
P. G. Yeole India
Hany Ezzat Khalil Egypt
Doha Abdou Mohamed Egypt
Sahar Y. Al‐Okbi Egypt
Balasundaram Jayakar India
Arun Shirwaikar India
Sitesh Chandra Bachar Bangladesh
Oliviu Voștinaru Romania
James Syce relative to Philip F. Uzor Nigeria Philip F. Uzor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Philip F. Uzor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Syce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Syce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Syce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Syce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Syce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Syce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Syce. The network helps show where James Syce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Syce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Syce Line = papers co-authored together James Syce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007234
2 199863
3 199860
4 200357
5 200855
6 200751
7 201044
8 200941
9 200940
10 201834
11 201632
12 201025
13 200124
14 201518
15 200714
16 201312
17 198911
18 19976
19 20166
20 20004

About James Syce

James Syce is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science, Food Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (4 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants (3 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (127 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (113 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (58 citations), Forestry (32 citations) and Plant Science (284 citations). James Syce has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Quinton Johnson, William R. Folk, G.J. Amabeoku, Sarel F. Malan, Alan Gilbert Christoffels, Samuel Ayodele Egieyeh, Wilfred T. Mabusela, Irina Russell, Shaun Pather and Steven Henry Neau. Their work appears in journals such as Planta Medica, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Journal of Natural Products.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact