James Stankiewicz

977 citations
14 papers · 709 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James Stankiewicz

14 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers

James Stankiewicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 230
  • Gastroenterology 44
  • Neurology 53
  • Molecular Biology 314
Replace Stefanie Haase with:
Stefanie Haase Germany
Daisuke Noto Japan
Laura Dumitrescu Romania
Jiangtao Jin China
Miho Mizuno Japan
Gordon Dale United Kingdom
Mary L. Holtz United States
Nelly Conus Australia
Brent S. Sokola United States
James Stankiewicz relative to Stefanie Haase Germany Stefanie Haase's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Stefanie Haase · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Stankiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Stankiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Stankiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Stankiewicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Stankiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Stankiewicz. The network helps show where James Stankiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Stankiewicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Stankiewicz Line = papers co-authored together James Stankiewicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2018199
2 2018109
3 200797
4 201489
5 200877
6 200764
7 201016
8 201716
9 201711
10 200810
11 201610
12 20215
13 20215
14 20171

About James Stankiewicz

James Stankiewicz is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (10 papers), RNA regulation and disease (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (1 paper), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (1 paper), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (1 paper), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (230 citations), Gastroenterology (44 citations), Neurology (53 citations) and Molecular Biology (314 citations). James Stankiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mohit Neema, Steven D. Brass, Howard L. Weiner, Brian C. Healy, Antonia Ceccarelli, Rohit Bakshi, Ashish Arora, Zachary D. Guss, Stephanie Tankou and Pia Kivisäkk. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, Neurotherapeutics and Seminars in Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact