James Smith

1.8k citations
54 papers · 962 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

James Smith

48 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Emergency Medical Services 76
  • General Health Professions 211
  • Virology 41
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 110
Replace Bridget Pratt with:
Bridget Pratt Australia
Giuliano Russo United Kingdom
Meghan D. Morris United States
Mohammad Afzal Mahmood Australia
Katie E. Nelson United States
Diane Meyer United States
Florencia Luna Argentina
Matthew M. Kavanagh United States
Fiona Leh Hoon Chuah Singapore
Arush Lal United Kingdom
James Smith relative to Bridget Pratt Australia Bridget Pratt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Bridget Pratt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017186
2 201887
3 202176
4 201968
5 201960
6 201850
7 200947
8 201936
9 202031
10 201729
11 201527
12 201525
13 200122
14
The Limits to Governance: The Challenge of Policy-Making for the New Life Sciences
200920
15 202216
16 201616
17 201615
18 202114
19 202413
20 202213

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 54 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Conflict Studies (11 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (7 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Global Security and Public Health (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (76 citations), General Health Professions (211 citations), Virology (41 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (110 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Karl Blanchet, Bayard Roberts, Neha Singh, Lale Say, Julien Potet, Lachlan McIver, Rajat Khosla, Kiran Jobanputra, Abigail Knight and Philippa Boulle. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Global Health, Journal of Migration and Health, Public Policy and Administration, Journal of Public Health and International Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact