Nathan Post
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies 3
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 3
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing 2
-
- Health and Conflict Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Madhumita Shrotri (5 shared papers)Sharif Ismail (5 shared papers)Catherine Huntley (5 shared papers)Samuel Rigby (5 shared papers)Sharon J. Peacock (5 shared papers)Sarah Williams (5 shared papers)Adrian Shields (4 shared papers)Danielle Eddy (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (1 paper)Health Research Policy and Systems (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesUganda
In The Last Decade
Nathan Post
11 papers receiving 838 citations
Nathan Post's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Infectious Diseases 455
- Modeling and Simulation 51
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 35
- Health 34
- Emergency Medical Services 28
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Post
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Post more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Post
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Post. The network helps show where Nathan Post may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 258 |
| 2 | 2020 | 234 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 186 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 79 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 7 | An evidence review of research on health interventions in humanitarian crises. Update October 2015 | 2015 | 9 |
| 8 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Nathan Post
Nathan Post is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Civil and Structural Engineering, Neurology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Migration, Health and Trauma (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (455 citations), Modeling and Simulation (51 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (35 citations), Health (34 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (28 citations). Nathan Post has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Madhumita Shrotri, Sharif Ismail, Catherine Huntley, Samuel Rigby, Sharon J. Peacock, Sarah Williams, Adrian Shields, Danielle Eddy, Paul Kellam and David Leeman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Health Research Policy and Systems, The Lancet and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.