James Simpson

32 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

James Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 52
  • Molecular Biology 196
  • Cancer Research 40
  • Physiology 12
Replace Hang Cao with:
Hang Cao China
Shumin Wu United States
Edoardo Giacopuzzi Italy
Lynn Zhang United States
M. Li United States
Jixiang Zhang China
Hong Dong United States
Rebecca E. Mercer Canada
Alan Chu China
Emilia Komulainen United Kingdom
James Simpson relative to Hang Cao China Hang Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Hang Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Simpson. The network helps show where James Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Simpson Line = papers co-authored together James Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199575
2 201056
3 200329
4 200323
5 201822
6 201820
7 201418
8 202015
9 200614
10 199411
11 19878
12 20207
13 20196
14 20226
15 20226
16 19885
17 20224
18 20224
19 19923
20 20213

About James Simpson

James Simpson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in Service Interactions (8 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (3 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (52 citations), Molecular Biology (196 citations), Cancer Research (40 citations) and Physiology (12 citations). James Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include F. Antoni, Janice M. Paterson, Susan M. Smith, Anders Haunsø, Richard J. O. Barnard, Michael J. Shipston, Lesley A. Stark, Carolyn J. Loveridge, Alexandra Clipson and Malcolm G. Dunlop. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Letters, Cognitive Science, Neurochemical Research, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact