James S. Marsh

577 citations
16 papers · 341 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

James S. Marsh

16 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

James S. Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Mathematics 123
  • Geometry and Topology 46
  • Algebra and Number Theory 19
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 14
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 43
Replace Daniel Grieser with:
Daniel Grieser Germany
J. W. Neuberger United States
David L. Webb United States
Guojun Liao United States
Brian J. McCartin United States
T. J. Willmore United Kingdom
Bernard Gostiaux France
Eugene D. Denman United States
Alain Grigis France
G. B. Mathews United States
James S. Marsh relative to Daniel Grieser Germany Daniel Grieser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Daniel Grieser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James S. Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Marsh. The network helps show where James S. Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside James S. Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James S. Marsh Line = papers co-authored together James S. Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1985232
2 197439
3 196624
4 19829
5 19907
6 19807
7 19844
8 19843
9 19763
10
The MAC calorimeters and applications
19822
11 19692
12 19952
13 19852
14 20012
15 19932
16
Toward the Ideal Military Aviation Sunglass
19911

About James S. Marsh

James S. Marsh is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced optical system design (2 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper), Optical measurement and interference techniques (1 paper), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (123 citations), Geometry and Topology (46 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (19 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (14 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (43 citations). James S. Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Garret Sobczyk, David Hestenes, Richard Smith, Leonard A. Temme, L. Baksay, I. Peruzzi, A. L. Read, M. Piccolo, F. J. Ronga and K. Appert. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Physical Review A, American Journal of Physics, Journal of the Optical Society of America and STIN.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact