K. Appert

2.4k citations
94 papers · 2k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

K. Appert

91 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

K. Appert
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.7k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 221
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 115
  • Numerical Analysis 36
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 192
Replace Wolfgang Kerner with:
Wolfgang Kerner Germany
A. Ghizzo France
A. Thyagaraja United Kingdom
Eric Fijalkow France
Masahiro Wakatani Japan
Vladimir Fuchs France
Dieter Pfirsch Germany
Abhay K. Ram United States
R. J. Hastie United Kingdom
L. I. Rudakov United States
K. Appert relative to Wolfgang Kerner Germany Wolfgang Kerner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Wolfgang Kerner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Appert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Appert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Appert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Appert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Appert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Appert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Appert. The network helps show where K. Appert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Appert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Appert Line = papers co-authored together K. Appert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007203
2 1982175
3 1974171
4 198696
5 200094
6 198481
7 199871
8 199161
9 198657
10 200156
11 197747
12 199546
13 197543
14 200041
15 200139
16 200230
17 198729
18 198929
19 198228
20 198228

About K. Appert

K. Appert is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (69 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (14 papers), Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (13 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (12 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (6 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (5 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.7k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (221 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (115 citations), Numerical Analysis (36 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (192 citations). K. Appert has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Václavík, Ronald P. Gruber, L. Ṽillard, T. M. Tran, Torbjörn Hellsten, Olivier Sauter, D. Berger, L. Muschietti, B. Balet and A. Bottino. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Physics Communications, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Nuclear Fusion, Physics Letters A and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact