James Rockey

600 citations
32 papers · 284 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Rockey

25 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

James Rockey
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 136
  • Political Science and International Relations 76
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24
  • Health 20
  • Gender Studies 24
Replace Lukas Schlögl with:
Lukas Schlögl Austria
Martin Guzi Czechia
Amy Y.C. Liu Australia
Lasse Eika Norway
Janet E. Kodras United States
Agustín Salvia Argentina
Arjun Wilkins United States
Giorgio Presidente United Kingdom
Natalie Bau United States
María Laura Sánchez Puerta United States
James Rockey relative to Lukas Schlögl Austria Lukas Schlögl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lukas Schlögl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Rockey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rockey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rockey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rockey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rockey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rockey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rockey. The network helps show where James Rockey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Rockey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Rockey Line = papers co-authored together James Rockey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201052
2 202039
3 201227
4 201526
5 202123
6 202123
7 201219
8 202011
9 20128
10 20216
11 20216
12 20225
13 20195
14 20205
15 20205
16 20234
17 20214
18 20214
19 20213
20 20253

About James Rockey

James Rockey is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (136 citations), Political Science and International Relations (76 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (24 citations), Health (20 citations) and Gender Studies (24 citations). James Rockey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Pickering, Jesse Matheson, Gianni De Fraja, Heather D. Flowe, Jonathan Temple, Melissa F. Colloff, Ben Lockwood, Laura Stevens, Lisa L. Smith and Patricia Broadfoot. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Political Economy, Scientific Reports, Public Choice, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact