James Read

57 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

James Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Theoretical Computer Science 41
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 336
  • History and Philosophy of Science 67
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 158
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 115
Replace Joy Christian with:
Joy Christian United Kingdom
Jonathan Bain United States
Henrique Gomes United Kingdom
Hrvoje Nikolić Croatia
S. Malin United States
Sebastian De Haro United Kingdom
Dirk-André Deckert Germany
Tim Koslowski Canada
H. P. Künzle Canada
Davide Fiscaletti Italy
James Read relative to Joy Christian United Kingdom Joy Christian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Joy Christian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Read. The network helps show where James Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside James Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Read Line = papers co-authored together James Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201835
2 201826
3 201723
4 202023
5 201821
6 201820
7 201916
8 202015
9 202314
10 201513
11 202313
12 202312
13 201812
14 201312
15 202211
16 202211
17 20189
18 19718
19 20218
20 20247

About James Read

James Read is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Relativity and Gravitational Theory (33 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (17 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (5 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (41 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (336 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (158 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (115 citations). James Read has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Teh, William J. Wolf, Baptiste Le Bihan, Niels Linnemann, Harvey R. Brown, Dennis Lehmkuhl, Niels C. M. Martens, Yang‐Hui He, John McKay and P. T. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity and European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact