Jonathan Bain

535 citations
31 papers · 294 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Bain

30 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Jonathan Bain
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • History and Philosophy of Science 108
  • Theoretical Computer Science 13
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 94
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 122
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 178
Replace Eleanor Knox with:
Eleanor Knox United Kingdom
Nicholas J. Teh United Kingdom
Joy Christian United Kingdom
Dennis Lehmkuhl United States
Vesselin Petkov Canada
Doreen Fraser Canada
Dirk-André Deckert Germany
James Read United Kingdom
Tomasz Placek Poland
J. Brian Pitts United Kingdom
Jonathan Bain relative to Eleanor Knox United Kingdom Eleanor Knox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Eleanor Knox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bain. The network helps show where Jonathan Bain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Bain Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Bain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200032
2 201327
3 201326
4 201125
5 200423
6 200317
7 201217
8 200115
9 201613
10 200611
11 201011
12 20209
13 19989
14 20009
15 20057
16 20167
17 19985
18 20115
19 20195
20
Condensed Matter Physics and the Nature of Spacetime
20074

About Jonathan Bain

Jonathan Bain is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 31 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (18 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (11 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (108 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (13 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (94 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (122 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (178 citations). Jonathan Bain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include John D. Norton and Max Jammer. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Synthese, Physics Today, Erkenntnis and Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact