Jonathan Bain
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
Papers in
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 15
- Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect 4
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories 8
- Co-authors
- Max Jammer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (10 papers)Synthese (3 papers)Erkenntnis (2 papers)Physics Today (2 papers)Philosophy of Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaChina
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Bain
26 papers receiving 192 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
- Theoretical Computer Science 12
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 91
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 69
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bain
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bain. The network helps show where Jonathan Bain may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | Condensed Matter Physics and the Nature of Spacetime | 2007 | 4 |
| 18 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 2 |
About Jonathan Bain
Jonathan Bain is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 26 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (15 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (91 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (69 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (131 citations). Jonathan Bain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include Max Jammer. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Synthese, Erkenntnis, Physics Today and Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.