James R. McFarlane

115 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

James R. McFarlane
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Reproductive Medicine 483
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 291
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 152
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 284
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 155
Replace V. Daniel Castracane with:
V. Daniel Castracane United States
Inese Z. Beitins United States
M. Yusoff Dawood United States
Kenneth C. Copeland United States
Mats Åkerlund Sweden
David C. Cumming Canada
William S. Evans United States
Jürgen Kratzsch Germany
Jüergen Kratzsch Germany
Andrew N. Margioris Greece
James R. McFarlane relative to V. Daniel Castracane United States V. Daniel Castracane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
V. Daniel Castracane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James R. McFarlane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James R. McFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. McFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. McFarlane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James R. McFarlane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. McFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. McFarlane. The network helps show where James R. McFarlane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James R. McFarlane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James R. McFarlane Line = papers co-authored together James R. McFarlane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015173
2 2013127
3 201695
4 199688
5 200483
6 201182
7 201474
8 199872
9 200562
10 200361
11 199861
12 201459
13 200957
14 200257
15 199654
16 201654
17 199853
18 201649
19 200449
20 201348

About James R. McFarlane

James R. McFarlane is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Physiology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 115 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include TGF-β signaling in diseases (25 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (18 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (17 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (14 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (11 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers) and Bone Metabolism and Diseases (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (483 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (291 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (152 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (284 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (155 citations). James R. McFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neil A. Smart, Gudrun Dieberg, Kate Kauter, Christopher F. Sharpley, I. Caroline McMillen, Muren Herrid, Hashbullah Ismail, David M. de Kretser, Tim O’Shea and Nicole Hess. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Biology of Reproduction, Reproduction Fertility and Development, Physiological Research and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact