James Pike
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 9
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 5
- Co-authors
- Richard Perry (2 shared papers)Ross J. Baldessarini (1 shared paper)David Price (3 shared papers)James Piercy (11 shared papers)Edward L. Jones (2 shared papers)Jacqueline R. Carranza Rosenzweig (1 shared paper)Mike Thomas (1 shared paper)Stephen Kay (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Value in Health (14 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (4 papers)Advances in Therapy (3 papers)Neurology (2 papers)Neurology and Therapy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
James Pike
72 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Family Practice 32
- Psychiatry and Mental health 211
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 188
- Physiology 241
- Human-Computer Interaction 40
Countries citing papers authored by James Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of James Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pike. The network helps show where James Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 230 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 86 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 18 |
About James Pike
James Pike is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Rheumatology, Immunology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (9 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (32 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (211 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (188 citations), Physiology (241 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (40 citations). James Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard Perry, Ross J. Baldessarini, David Price, James Piercy, Edward L. Jones, Jacqueline R. Carranza Rosenzweig, Mike Thomas, Stephen Kay, Angela Williams and Elizabeth V. Hillyer. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Advances in Therapy, Neurology and Neurology and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.