James Peck

2.6k citations
103 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

James Peck

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Marketing 349
  • Management Science and Operations Research 366
  • General Decision Sciences 53
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 229
  • Finance 271
Replace Daniel Bradley with:
Daniel Bradley United States
Walter N. Thurman United States
Paul Ormerod United Kingdom
John Gould United States
Jonathan Hamilton United States
Steven C. Hackett United States
Gordon J. Alexander United States
Joseph Williams United States
Shlomo Maital Israel
Dong Lou United Kingdom
James Peck relative to Daniel Bradley United States Daniel Bradley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Daniel Bradley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Peck. The network helps show where James Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Peck Line = papers co-authored together James Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003169
2 1990143
3
Demand Uncertainty and Price Maintenance: Markdowns as Destructive Competition
1997111
4 1995110
5 1995105
6
The Chomsky Reader
198787
7 199185
8 199681
9 200977
10 199264
11 199161
12 201243
13 199439
14 198638
15 198836
16 199031
17 200327
18 199023
19 199222
20 200921

About James Peck

James Peck is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research and Marketing, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (32 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (32 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (23 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (19 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Game Theory and Applications (12 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (9 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (349 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (366 citations), General Decision Sciences (53 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (229 citations) and Finance (271 citations). James Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karl Shell, Raymond Deneckere, Howard P. Marvel, Donald R. Farrar, Noam Chomsky, Dan Levin, Lixin Ye, Rodolfo E. Manuelli, Dan Levin and Stephen E. Spear. Their work appears in journals such as American Fern Journal, Journal of Economic Theory, Games and Economic Behavior, International Economic Review and American Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact