Stephen E. Spear

1.9k citations
35 papers · 960 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Spear

30 papers receiving 862 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Spear
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Economics and Econometrics 623
  • Management Science and Operations Research 196
  • Finance 114
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 70
  • Accounting 89
Replace Martine Quinzii with:
Martine Quinzii United States
James S. Jordan United States
Luca Vittorio Angelo Colombo Italy
Ryuzo Sato United States
Sven Rady Germany
Peter Norman Sørensen Denmark
Pierre M. Picard France
Stefan Krasa United States
Rabah Amir United States
Michael J. P. Magill United States
Stephen E. Spear relative to Martine Quinzii United States Martine Quinzii's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Martine Quinzii · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Spear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Spear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Spear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Spear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Spear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Spear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Spear. The network helps show where Stephen E. Spear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Spear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Spear Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Spear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987308
2 1993110
3 198897
4 199256
5 198953
6 200442
7 198537
8 199029
9 198426
10 199125
11 198618
12 198817
13 198917
14 200317
15 201317
16 199215
17 199815
18 200615
19 19929
20 20017

About Stephen E. Spear

Stephen E. Spear is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Life-span and Life-course Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 35 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (26 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (623 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (196 citations), Finance (114 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (70 citations) and Accounting (89 citations). Stephen E. Spear has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Sanjay Srivastava, Alberto Alesina, Shyam Sunder, Ramón Marimon, Cheng Wang, James Herbert Peck, Karl Shell, Warren Young, Michael Woodford and Sean Crockett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Economic Theory and Journal of Public Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact