Stephen E. Spear

1.9k citations
36 papers · 970 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Spear

30 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Spear
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 262
  • Economics and Econometrics 798
  • General Decision Sciences 47
  • Finance 215
  • Management Science and Operations Research 220
Replace Javier Perote with:
Javier Perote Spain
Margaret Bray United Kingdom
Aloísio Araújo Brazil
Martine Quinzii United States
Hans Carlsson Sweden
Val E. Lambson United States
Pami Dua India
Michael Magill United States
Semyon Malamud Switzerland
Steven C. Mann United States
Stephen E. Spear relative to Javier Perote Spain Javier Perote's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Javier Perote · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Spear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Spear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Spear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Spear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Spear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Spear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Spear. The network helps show where Stephen E. Spear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Spear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Spear Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Spear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987388
2 1993116
3 199264
4 200461
5 198947
6 199033
7 198533
8 198425
9 199122
10 198621
11 200319
12 198918
13 198817
14 201317
15 199814
16 199213
17 19989
18 20048
19 20178
20 19927

About Stephen E. Spear

Stephen E. Spear is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Accounting and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 970 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (30 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (13 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (13 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (3 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (262 citations), Economics and Econometrics (798 citations), General Decision Sciences (47 citations), Finance (215 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (220 citations). Stephen E. Spear has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sanjay Srivastava, Shyam Sunder, Ramón Marimon, Cheng Wang, James Peck, Karl Shell, Michael Woodford, Warren Young, Aditya Goenka and David L. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Economic Theory and Mathematical and Computer Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact