James Peacock

78 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

James Peacock
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Anthropology 182
  • Cultural Studies 103
  • Sociology and Political Science 496
  • Geography, Planning and Development 42
  • Clinical Psychology 128
Replace Roger Sanjek with:
Roger Sanjek United States
Carol A. Smith United States
Audrey Smedley United States
Carol J. Greenhouse United States
Sylvia D. Hoffert United States
Charles Crothers New Zealand
Pamela J. Stewart United States
Susan D. Amussen United States
Stjepan G. Meštrović United States
Vikki Bell United Kingdom
James Peacock relative to Roger Sanjek United States Roger Sanjek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Roger Sanjek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Peacock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Peacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Peacock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Peacock. The network helps show where James Peacock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Peacock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Peacock Line = papers co-authored together James Peacock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983186
2 1993144
3 1983133
4 201490
5 198884
6 198756
7 199751
8 200637
9
Muslim puritans: Reformist psychology in Southeast Asian Islam
197836
10 201135
11 196933
12 197833
13 200126
14 197926
15 197824
16 197822
17 200722
18 200620
19 200115
20
Impact of insulin on doxorubicin-induced rat host toxicity and tumor regression.
198714

About James Peacock

James Peacock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (11 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (4 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (4 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (182 citations), Cultural Studies (103 citations), Sociology and Political Science (496 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations) and Clinical Psychology (128 citations). James Peacock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy Holland, L. L. Langness, Gelya Frank, W. Thomas Boyce, Sherman A. James, David Hicks, Jeffrey A. Norton, Joseph E. Schwartz, Keith M. Diaz and Daichi Shimbo. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Journal of American Folklore, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Social Forces and Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact