Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction

1.1k papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (668 papers), Sociology and Political Science (184 papers) and Philosophy (132 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (378 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (132 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction are Tom LeClair, David Cowart, Larry McCaffery, Todd McGowan, Elke D’hoker, Robert M. Post, John Johnston, Jago Morrison, N. Katherine Hayles and I. R. Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction.

Countries where authors publish in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025