James O’Sullivan

633 citations
56 papers · 283 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

James O’Sullivan

45 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

James O’Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Literature and Literary Theory 60
  • Anthropology 45
  • Conservation 12
  • Classics 14
  • Archeology 35
Replace Jan Christoph Meister with:
Jan Christoph Meister Germany
Michael Twyman United Kingdom
Jost Gippert Germany
Folgert Karsdorp Netherlands
Ray Siemens Canada
Roopika Risam United States
Milad Doueihi France
Michael Witmore United States
Daniel Ferrer France
Julia Noordegraaf Netherlands
James O’Sullivan relative to Jan Christoph Meister Germany Jan Christoph Meister's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jan Christoph Meister · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James O’Sullivan. The network helps show where James O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James O’Sullivan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James O’Sullivan Line = papers co-authored together James O’Sullivan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201941
2 202326
3 197723
4 201419
5 199519
6 199514
7 201713
8 202212
9 198011
10 20189
11 20199
12 20208
13 20137
14 20117
15 20156
16 20225
17 19933
18 20213
19 19903
20 20193

About James O’Sullivan

James O’Sullivan is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Anthropology and Conservation, having authored 56 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (22 papers), Digital Games and Media (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (5 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (60 citations), Anthropology (45 citations), Conservation (12 citations), Classics (14 citations) and Archeology (35 citations). James O’Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Rentschler, Ants Remm, Andreas Wallraff, Christopher Eichler, Kevin Reuer, Graham Allen, Mary Galvin, Maciej Eder, Abdulkadir Akın and Florian Marquardt. Their work appears in journals such as Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, The Classical Quarterly, Symbolae Osloenses, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies and The American Journal of Philology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact