Anna Glaser

54 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Anna Glaser
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 473
  • Neurology 100
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 80
  • Genetics 321
  • Neurology 147
Replace Ekaterini Tsilou with:
Ekaterini Tsilou United States
Roberta P. Glick United States
Carlos E. Prada United States
Francesca L. Sciacca Italy
Andreas Schoetzau Switzerland
Jacinthe Sirois Canada
Siddhartha Kar United Kingdom
Anne Waschbisch Germany
Dianne Abuelo United States
Nadia Sakati Saudi Arabia
Anna Glaser relative to Ekaterini Tsilou United States Ekaterini Tsilou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ekaterini Tsilou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Glaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Glaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Glaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Glaser. The network helps show where Anna Glaser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Glaser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Glaser Line = papers co-authored together Anna Glaser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996219
2 1991141
3 1989120
4 2016119
5 2017108
6 1998101
7 200970
8 201856
9 199455
10 199952
11 201347
12 201746
13 201435
14 201735
15 201533
16 200331
17 202130
18 200727
19 200926
20 200025

About Anna Glaser

Anna Glaser is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (21 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (6 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (3 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (473 citations), Neurology (100 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (80 citations), Genetics (321 citations) and Neurology (147 citations). Anna Glaser has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Hillert, Rolf Ohlsson, Susan Pfeifer‐Ohlsson, Lars Holmgren, Holger Luthman, Joakim Galli, Ali Manouchehrinia, Hossein Fakhrai-Rad, Howard J. Jacob and Claes‐Göran Östenson. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, PLoS ONE, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact