James Ost

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

James Ost

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

James Ost
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 733
  • Social Psychology 599
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 209
  • Clinical Psychology 265
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Replace Amye R. Warren with:
Amye R. Warren United States
Helen M. Paterson Australia
Heather L. Price Canada
Elin M. Skagerberg United Kingdom
Jacqueline E. Pickrell United States
Coral J. Dando United Kingdom
Aurora G. Suengas Spain
Deryn Strange United States
Lucy Akehurst United Kingdom
Andrew Parker United Kingdom
James Ost relative to Amye R. Warren United States Amye R. Warren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Amye R. Warren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Ost

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Ost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Ost

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ost. The network helps show where James Ost may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Ost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Ost Line = papers co-authored together James Ost links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016109
2 200782
3 200271
4 201364
5 200653
6 201053
7 201151
8 200446
9 200737
10 201637
11 200835
12 201132
13 200126
14 200224
15 201324
16 201623
17 200323
18 200623
19 200221
20 200921

About James Ost

James Ost is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (25 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (24 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (6 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (733 citations), Social Psychology (599 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (209 citations), Clinical Psychology (265 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). James Ost has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gavin Oxburgh, Alan Costall, Ray Bull, Lorraine Hope, Julie Cherryman, Aldert Vrij, Hartmut Blank, Lucy Akehurst, Kimberley A. Wade and Simon Easton. Their work appears in journals such as Memory, Psychology Crime and Law, Applied Cognitive Psychology, British Journal of Psychology and Acta Psychologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact