James Ost

1.6k citations
48 papers · 1.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

James Ost

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Ost
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 779
  • Social Psychology 636
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 218
  • Clinical Psychology 291
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
Replace Jacqueline E. Pickrell with:
Jacqueline E. Pickrell United States
Deryn Strange United States
Amye R. Warren United States
Heather L. Price Canada
Coral J. Dando United Kingdom
Aurora G. Suengas Spain
Elin M. Skagerberg United Kingdom
Helen M. Paterson Australia
Janat Fraser Parker United States
Robyn E. Holliday United Kingdom
James Ost relative to Jacqueline E. Pickrell United States Jacqueline E. Pickrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jacqueline E. Pickrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Ost

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Ost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Ost

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ost. The network helps show where James Ost may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Ost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Ost Line = papers co-authored together James Ost links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016123
2 200784
3 200273
4 201370
5 200659
6 201156
7 201056
8 200448
9 201641
10 200740
11 200835
12 201135
13 200228
14 200127
15 200627
16 201326
17 201625
18 200224
19 200323
20 200921

About James Ost

James Ost is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (26 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (26 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (7 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (779 citations), Social Psychology (636 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (218 citations), Clinical Psychology (291 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). James Ost has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gavin Oxburgh, Alan Costall, Ray Bull, Lorraine Hope, Julie Cherryman, Aldert Vrij, Hartmut Blank, Lucy Akehurst, Kimberley A. Wade and Christopher C. French. Their work appears in journals such as Memory, Psychology Crime and Law, Applied Cognitive Psychology, British Journal of Psychology and Acta Psychologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact