James N. Bow

31 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

James N. Bow
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Demography 270
  • Applied Psychology 96
  • Clinical Psychology 317
  • Health 79
  • Safety Research 76
Replace Arnold L. Stolberg with:
Arnold L. Stolberg United States
Marion F. Ehrenberg Canada
Kathryn Kuehnle United States
S. J. Bailey United States
Neil Kalter United States
Diogo Lamela Portugal
Tamarha Pierce Canada
Darya D. Bonds United States
Kuei‐Hsiu Lin United States
Ricky Finzi‐Dottan Israel
James N. Bow relative to Arnold L. Stolberg United States Arnold L. Stolberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Arnold L. Stolberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James N. Bow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James N. Bow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. Bow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. Bow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James N. Bow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. Bow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. Bow. The network helps show where James N. Bow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James N. Bow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James N. Bow Line = papers co-authored together James N. Bow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001110
2 200169
3 200246
4 200344
5 200243
6 200942
7 200441
8 198726
9 200425
10 200624
11 201421
12 201019
13 200618
14 200613
15 201012
16 202110
17 20119
18 20018
19 20167
20 19887

About James N. Bow

James N. Bow is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Demography, Safety Research and Applied Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (12 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (7 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (270 citations), Applied Psychology (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (317 citations), Health (79 citations) and Safety Research (76 citations). James N. Bow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Francella A. Quinnell, Jonathan W. Gould, James R. Flens, Paul Boxer, Michael C. Gottlieb, Craig N. Karson, Terry E. Goldberg, Linda Forrest, Jennifer A. Erickson Cornish and Pamela S. Ludolph. Their work appears in journals such as Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact